Contact & FAQ

At least one issue of Appalachian Genealogy & History is fully readable each month for free subscribers, though more are often available. Free subscribers also have access to the weekly podcast and all YouTube and Facebook content. Paid subscribers receive full access to every post with no paywall, access to the subscriber-only chat, and the Resource Library, which includes all Essential Research Series guides and issue companion documents. The paid tier is $7 per month or $70 per year.

The Newsletter page shows recently published issues pulled directly from Substack. For the full archive going back to the beginning, visit appalachiangenealogy.substack.com and browse by date or topic.

New issues are published on a regular schedule throughout the year. Subscribing on Substack is the best way to be notified the moment a new issue goes out.

The Resource Library includes two types of content: Essential Research Series guides, which are standalone deep-dive PDF guides published by Appalachian Press, and issue companion documents, which are research reference sheets tied to specific newsletter issues. All content is exclusive to paid subscribers.

Not every issue has a companion. Companion documents are created for issues where a reference sheet, worksheet, or record guide adds genuine research value. When a companion exists, it is listed in the Resource Library.

The Resource Library lives on Substack. Make sure you are logged into your Substack account with the same email address tied to your paid subscription. If you are logged in and still cannot access the content, use the contact form on this page and include your Substack email address so the issue can be looked into.

The Appalachian Historical Review podcast is available on Spotify, on Substack, and on the YouTube podcast playlist.

Topic suggestions are always welcome. Use the contact form on this page and select "Newsletter" or "Podcast" as the topic. Not every suggestion will result in an episode or issue, but all suggestions are read and considered.

All currently available titles are listed on The Press page with direct links to purchase on Amazon. Titles are available in paperback and, where noted, as ebooks.

The Essential Research Series guides are published by Appalachian Press and are included exclusively with a paid Substack subscription. They are separate from the titles listed for sale on The Press page, which are available for individual purchase on Amazon.

No. Standard AI tools are power hogs because they use massive, bloated networks that try to memorize the entire internet just to answer a prompt.

My audio tools use a highly efficient setup called Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). When I paste my script into my tool, the AI doesn't have to search a giant, power-hungry brain. It reads only the specific text I provided. It is a lightweight process that keeps the carbon footprint incredibly small.

Not at all. Think of standard AI like someone trying to write an audio script based on everything they have ever read in their entire life; it takes a massive amount of brainpower, and they still hallucinate or get facts wrong.

My tool turns it into an open-book test. I hand it the script, and the AI simply processes the exact text in front of it. I get highly accurate, localized results without the massive energy bill required to run a giant model.

Every time someone runs a prompt on a standard massive AI model, data centers have to fire up thousands of specialized chips, drawing huge amounts of electricity and water for cooling.

Because my tools only focus on the script I upload, they can run on a much smaller, highly optimized framework. It gives me the deep processing I need for my audio projects using a fraction of the electricity per request.

Generating brand-new video or images from a text prompt requires immense data center power because the AI has to build pixels out of thin air. Most of my images and videos I have purchased or, on occasion, used digital means to draw myself.

Therefore, the tools I use don't do that. I upload my finished video, and the tool simply reads it to overlay the text captions. It is a targeted, analytical process rather than a heavy creative one. Processing a file I already made uses a fraction of the energy required to generate AI visuals from scratch.

Yes. By providing my own audio scripts, videos, and finished content, I am doing the heavy lifting. The AI is just acting as an efficient assistant to format, caption, and polish your work. It keeps the data usage local, the processing fast, and the environmental impact minimal.